From LtoJ Consulting Group, Inc.

NEWSLETTER

March, 2007

1.  In the LtoJ seminars I suggest that middle and high schools allow students  permission to create  interdisciplinary assignments.  The simple concept is to receive credit from multiple teachers for the same assignment.  Attached is a sample interdisciplinary assignment form designed by faculty at Santa Cruz Valley High School in Eloy, Arizona, complete with the school mascot. See the bottom of this newsletter for the attachment.

2.  I will again be presenting for the Department of Education in Arizona on April 25-26 and May 1-3.  The URL for registration is http://www.ade.az.gov/onlineregistration/EventLocationSelection.asp?EventID=1311&EventDate=4/25/2007

3. The following structure has nothing to do with the LtoJ process, but may be of interest to readers of this newsletter:   Elementary staffs often consider departmentalization when pressure for increased student learning is applied.  Many believe, however, that separate teachers for each subject is not appropriate for elementary children.  One alternative structure to consider is having a three-person team composed of one 3rd, one 4th and one 5th teacher (in a K-5 school).  One of the teachers would specialize in science, one in social studies and one in math.  All would teach their own language arts/reading.  Each teacher would have their home room in the morning to teach language arts and their specialty.  In the afternoon, each teacher would teach their specialty to two other groups of children.  For example, a fourth grade teacher with a science specialty would teach language arts and science to fourth grade students in the morning, and science to 3rd and 5th in the afternoon.  Students stay with the team of three teachers for three years.  The advantage is that students have the benefit of specialists for science, social studies and math, but only have three teachers over the course of three years. 

4.  A question came in this month from Lordsburg, NM in regards to LtoJ implementation.  The question was, "If we supply a word bank for our LtoJ quizzes the first semester, would it be OK to take away the word bank second semester."  The answer is, "Yes."  The only suggestion is to annotate the graph at semester.  Write a note on the classroom chart that says, "Took away word bank."  Everyone who reads graph would understand why there was a sudden drop at semester.

5.  To read a recent article I wrote entitled "People Problem or System Problem" click on the URL http://www.aasa.org/publications/saarticledetail.cfm?ItemNumber=8225

6.  All prior newsletters and attachments are now posted on the LtoJ Consulting web site, www.ltojconsulting.com.  If you change e-mail addresses, please go the web site and sign up as if a new recipient of the newsletter.  Please include name, e-mail address and state, if USA, and country if outside of the US. 

 

 

Lee Jenkins, Lee@LtoJConsulting.com

spacer (1K)

For Administrators:

For five months I am describing  five key graphs for analyzing summative data.   The prior two graphs were the "one-line" and the radar chart.  This month I am highlighting the Pareto Chart.  The attached graph is from Carolyn Ayres' 2nd grade classroom in California.  I have made these graphs on numerous occasions for schools and for districts. My recommendation is that educators analyze Pareto Charts for classrooms, schools and districts.  It does take some hand work to create the Pareto Charts as state reports do not make it easy to find out how many errors were made in each strand. 

I have used QI Macros, http://www.qimacros.com/excel-spc-software.html, to construct Pareto Charts.  (However, you can place "Pareto" in a search engine and find directions.) If a school district becomes serious about providing Pareto Charts from annual results, the cost from QI Macros is well worth it.  The software also creates the control charts that I will describe in two months.

The Pareto Chart is a tool for establishing priorities.  In the attached Pareto Chart, for example, almost 50% of the errors come from three strands.  (It is very common that a majority of the errors come from a few strands.)  When educators study Pareto Charts it is much easier to establish next year's instructional priorities.

spacer (1K)
spacer (1K)
spacer (1K)
spacer (1K)
© 2007 Lee Jenkins

2006 Newsletters: April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December

2007 Newsletters: February - March - April - May - June/July - August/September -

2008 Newsletters: January - April - June -

Downloads: Arizona Republic Word Doc
  AZ 4th NAEP PDF
  PFT First Chapter PDF
  Kindergarten Reading from Jenks all four PDF
  Curriculum and Instructions Matrix for LtoJ PDF
  Grading for Finals -- Options PDF
  Pine Island 7th year Complete PDF
  L to J Logos PDF
  L to Bell to J PPT
  L to Bell to J PDF
  KDS Flyer _Lee Jenkins PDF
  Colombia LtoJ slide PPT
  Monthly Enthusiasm Chart PDF
  Rochester_ IN One-Line Annual Graph PPT
  Cecil County Radar Chart PPTĀ 
  School Run Chart_ Lexington PDF
  Principal Start-Up Project DOC
  Cloze example DOC
  Correlation Chart PDF
  6 Histograms for Newsletter PDF
  Venn Diagram PDF
  Control Chart PDF
  Rochester 2007 Summer Flyer PDF
  Slides from ESU 7 PDF
  Pareto Chart Directions PDF
  Hot Potatoe PPT
  Council Bluffs IA math 10 years PPT
  Dan McCaulley Social Studies PDF
  Lexington Slides PDF
  Ten Root Causes Describe Waste PPT
  Plainview Vertical Jump PDF
  Three Letter Word Graph PDF
  Jenks Biology Continuous Improvement DOC
  Georgia Reading Correlation PPT
  Chart as the Cover of School DOC
  Burgard flyer PDF